| Respect and optimism in
Johnella Bird’s approach
• Focus is movement supported by bringing forward resources
of the family
• Hearing resources languaged in the room increases their
availability
Profound respect for
the resources and knowledge of the family is key to collaborative
family work. This respect influences the amount of interest we have
in hearing about the family members’ decision processes. Asking
a question about family practices has the focus of enabling them
to hear themselves describe their agency, knowledge intentions,
hopes and commitment and put them into words. This can be particularly
potent in a family context as other members of the family are also
hearing this, not just the person giving form to the ideas.
Rather than identifying deficiencies, the focus
is movement. It is the resources of the family which will enable
movement. As with individual work processes of inquiry
and gathering threads is
used to bring these forward, developing a sense, in the moment,
that change is possible. This inquiry can be done in a spirit of
conversational interest and curiosity, as with an agenda of one
family asking about another family’s practice, in order to
open options they might consider. For example:
"How do you do things in your family?"
"How do you decide who does the dishes?"
"How well does it work?"
"What do you do if this doesn’t work?"
"Who else in the Family has had experience of something like
this? How did they deal with it?"
"How has the Family got through other difficult times?"
As clinicians, we develop ideas about the families
which can inform the questions. For instance:
“How do you think the experience of parenting
you had as a child influences the strategies you use in your parenting
now?”
Relational
externalising
• Contrasts with totalizing and traditional externalizing
• Opens space for the family to look in on the issue in relation
with themselves
Relational externalizing can also be used in a
family context. This contrasts with totalizing language and traditional
externalizing.
Totalising language:
- We are a disconnected / dysfunctional / violent family.
- What led to your becoming a violent family?
- How long have you been a violent family?
Traditional externalising:
- What effect does this violence have on your family?
- How did the violence get into your family?
- How does the violence protect itself from being stamped out?
Relational externalising:
- The violent acts you describe, are you noticing them more
at some times than others?
- This lack of respect you have noticed in your children, is
it more noticeable at some times than others?
Compare:
"Are you a close family?" versus "What
sorts of closeness do you experience in your family?"
" Did she attach well?" versus "What signs of attachment
does she show?"
" Have you grieved for …?" versus "What sorts
of grieving have different members of the family engaged in?"
" Do you trust Johnny again?" versus "Are you noticing
signs of trust starting to build again?"
" Are you an OK parent?" versus "What parenting
that you do would you describe as OK?"
|